<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review Board 1.0 Released!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.chipx86.com/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.chipx86.com/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/</link>
	<description>Various stuff from some guy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 12:39:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: venkat98</title>
		<link>http://blog.chipx86.com/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/#comment-1268</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[venkat98]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=313#comment-1268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well done, sir (and to everybody who worked on this). Reviewboard has been a high quality product for quite some time now; I’ve been enjoying watching it develop.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done, sir (and to everybody who worked on this). Reviewboard has been a high quality product for quite some time now; I’ve been enjoying watching it develop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell Mansfield</title>
		<link>http://blog.chipx86.com/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/#comment-1267</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darrell Mansfield]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=313#comment-1267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great work on RB!
Reviewboard has been a high quality product for quite some time now. And it is developed by some real professional blokes!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work on RB!<br />
Reviewboard has been a high quality product for quite some time now. And it is developed by some real professional blokes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChipX86</title>
		<link>http://blog.chipx86.com/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/#comment-1266</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ChipX86]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 03:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=313#comment-1266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JD: I&#039;d e-mail the mailing list, see if other people are working on this, and then look into our existing reviewboard/scmtools/*.py files to get a feel for how you&#039;d need to implement this. SCM support isn&#039;t *too* complex, though I wouldn&#039;t say it&#039;s trivial either.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JD: I&#8217;d e-mail the mailing list, see if other people are working on this, and then look into our existing reviewboard/scmtools/*.py files to get a feel for how you&#8217;d need to implement this. SCM support isn&#8217;t *too* complex, though I wouldn&#8217;t say it&#8217;s trivial either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sachin Gupta</title>
		<link>http://blog.chipx86.com/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/#comment-1265</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sachin Gupta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 03:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=313#comment-1265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You guys are rocking there. I am wondering why does the demo server have more registered users ;-) Summer of code should be exciting, let see if you come out of 1.1 quickly.

I think you guys should just have hooks for SCMs and allow anyone to integrate their SCM. Most SCM can be configured to insist on &#039;reviews&#039; before a commit is made.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys are rocking there. I am wondering why does the demo server have more registered users <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Summer of code should be exciting, let see if you come out of 1.1 quickly.</p>
<p>I think you guys should just have hooks for SCMs and allow anyone to integrate their SCM. Most SCM can be configured to insist on &#8216;reviews&#8217; before a commit is made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://blog.chipx86.com/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/#comment-1264</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=313#comment-1264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chip, it seems that Sourcegear Vault does have a command line interface - http://download.sourcegear.com/misc/vault/help/client/clc.htm

What would be the next step for integrating with it (I&#039;m a Java guy though ...).

Thanks,
JD]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chip, it seems that Sourcegear Vault does have a command line interface &#8211; <a href="http://download.sourcegear.com/misc/vault/help/client/clc.htm" rel="nofollow">http://download.sourcegear.com/misc/vault/help/client/clc.htm</a></p>
<p>What would be the next step for integrating with it (I&#8217;m a Java guy though &#8230;).</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
JD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChipX86</title>
		<link>http://blog.chipx86.com/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/#comment-1263</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ChipX86]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=313#comment-1263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JD: Thanks!

People have talked about writing support. For many SCMs (especially Windows-based or for-cost SCMs) we pretty much rely on third parties to provide support. Fortunately this is easy, so long as there&#039;s a command line tool or Python-enabled API for talking to the repository. We&#039;d be glad to work with people on this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JD: Thanks!</p>
<p>People have talked about writing support. For many SCMs (especially Windows-based or for-cost SCMs) we pretty much rely on third parties to provide support. Fortunately this is easy, so long as there&#8217;s a command line tool or Python-enabled API for talking to the repository. We&#8217;d be glad to work with people on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://blog.chipx86.com/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/#comment-1262</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=313#comment-1262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great work on RB! It&#039;s really great. In my opinion its more user friendly than SmartBear&#039;s CodeCollaborator.

Integration options for other SCM would be awesome. We&#039;re waiting for the Vault/VSS integration. Is there any ETA on that?

Thanks,
JD]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work on RB! It&#8217;s really great. In my opinion its more user friendly than SmartBear&#8217;s CodeCollaborator.</p>
<p>Integration options for other SCM would be awesome. We&#8217;re waiting for the Vault/VSS integration. Is there any ETA on that?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
JD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dev Blog AF83 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Veille technologique : Microsoft, Organisation, Ruby, Rails, PHP, Langages, Sécurité</title>
		<link>http://blog.chipx86.com/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/#comment-1261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dev Blog AF83 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Veille technologique : Microsoft, Organisation, Ruby, Rails, PHP, Langages, Sécurité]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=313#comment-1261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/ : Review Board sort en version 1.0 [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/" rel="nofollow">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/</a> : Review Board sort en version 1.0 [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Matthews</title>
		<link>http://blog.chipx86.com/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/#comment-1260</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh Matthews]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=313#comment-1260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the record, I gave a presentation about Review Board at my former workplace, and everyone watching was quite impressed.  This was back in winter of 2008, no less.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, I gave a presentation about Review Board at my former workplace, and everyone watching was quite impressed.  This was back in winter of 2008, no less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Tredinnick</title>
		<link>http://blog.chipx86.com/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released/#comment-1259</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Malcolm Tredinnick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=313#comment-1259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well done, sir (and to everybody who worked on this). Reviewboard has been a high quality product for quite some time now; I&#039;ve been enjoying watching it develop.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done, sir (and to everybody who worked on this). Reviewboard has been a high quality product for quite some time now; I&#8217;ve been enjoying watching it develop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

