http://blog.chipx86.com/2010/05/04/looking-back-on-review-board/ Various stuff from some guy. Thu, 03 May 2012 12:39:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://blog.chipx86.com/2010/05/04/looking-back-on-review-board/#comment-1555 Thu, 10 Nov 2011 21:39:49 +0000 http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=329#comment-1555 Success on the confusing second trophy for sure. I couldn’t find any info on Google for the fish trophy I was just awarded for review request #1661. I did find this article, at least.

]]> http://blog.chipx86.com/2010/05/04/looking-back-on-review-board/#comment-1284 Mon, 10 May 2010 11:14:30 +0000 http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=329#comment-1284 Haha the part about the trophy code bug was hilarious!

]]> http://blog.chipx86.com/2010/05/04/looking-back-on-review-board/#comment-1283 Thu, 06 May 2010 15:30:42 +0000 http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=329#comment-1283 We used RB in our project for about 8 months. Later we switched to Crucible (not our decision) and the experience was very bad to say the least.
What makes RB a really good tool is highly usable UI, easy installation/setup, post-review tool and that it is open source.
I don’t think I will ever again use anything other than RB if the decision is left to me. Thanks for making such a wonderfull tool.

]]> http://blog.chipx86.com/2010/05/04/looking-back-on-review-board/#comment-1282 Wed, 05 May 2010 04:30:34 +0000 http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=329#comment-1282 Agree with the comments on writing diff viewers – wrote one myself a while back, based like your second one on the Python difflib module. It worked, but was never very satisfactory…

]]>