Top Rated
Top Rated
Recent Posts
Archives
- March 2012
- September 2011
- February 2011
- August 2010
- May 2010
- November 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
Tags
Art
ChipX86.com
Devices
Django
Djblets
Dream-Theater
Gaim
Galago
gameboy-ds
Games
GNOME
Hardware
IBM
Jamie
Jenna
Lenovo
libnotify
libsexy
Life
Linux
Linux Desktop
Mario-Bros
Nintendo
Nokia 770
notification-daemon
Open Source
Pictures
Pirate
Products
Projects
Purchases
Python
Releases
Review-Board
Server
Thinkpad
TV
Ubuntu
Unity
Vacation
VMware
Wii
Workstation
Yahoo
Zelda
I’ve often felt the need for a tool exactly like reviewboard, and from a first use it seems great. I tried to install it on my server to use it for reviewing gedit patches but it did not work very well (not sure what the problem was). It would be great to have a reviewboard somewhere on the gnome website to be used by gnome modules like gedit.
Could you use identica in addition (or even instead of) twitter? It’s Free Software, a Free Network Service, and even includes a twitter bridge. http://identi.ca Thanks!
@Jesse: Can you describe what issues you were hitting? If there’s a problem we can fix, I’d like to fix it
As for a gnome Review Board server, I’d also love that, but I don’t have the resources to provide it. If someone else does, I’d definitely help set it up and maintain it.
@Craig: This isn’t the first time someone’s told me I should move to identica because it’s free software, but truth be told, I like Twitter, know people there, a lot people use it, and it works well for me. I can look into maintaining an identica account later on, but I’m probably not going to switch over entirely. Free software is important to me, but I don’t believe that everything I use absolutely must be free.
I think it was mostly a memory issue (I have a small virtual server only). I just tried to install it again (saw that it now has easy_install and rb-site utility). I’ll try to see if the same thing happens again. One thing I noticed was that the rb-site script crashed for me two times, first time because I did not have memcache installed, second time because I did not create the db user yet. It would be great if some checks here could be added (because now I had to type in all the information three times).
@Jesse: There’s definitely some things we need to improve with rb-site. It’s very young. Would you mind filing bugs on any issues you hit? I’ll see what I can do before 1.0.
Ok, I filed the bugs. I left the site running for a while (not accessing it) and the memory in my virtual server kept increasing steadily, until after some time all memory was used (normal memory use level is 60%). I have 256MB guaranteed +- 768MB ‘dynamic’ RAM. Is there a way to reduce the memory footprint?
Is the memory usage from memcached or the web server? What web server and python loader module is being used? We’ve found mod_python to work the best and fastcgi to trigger memory problems.
I’m using mod_python and from what I could tell it was apache (e.g. probably mod_python) which was memory hungry.
There might some tweaks you can do to Apache itself. I recommend posting to our mailing list and asking about that. I believe David Trowbridge would be able to give you more information on what we’ve done to reduce our memory footprint at VMware.
Review Board does require a not insignificant amount of memory to run, depending on the size of the install. This is not due to Review Board being bloated, but rather the operations we perform are just memory intensive. Generating side-by-side HTML diffs based on fetched files from repositories and the uploaded patches applied to them, rebuilding them once they’ve fallen out of the cache and are requested again… It’s not cheap, memory-wise or CPU-wise. In the future, we might be able to optimize it further, but the main thing is that we must cache all this data, which takes memory.
Yes I gathered that much, one of the reasons why I’d like to see a place on a gnome server somewhere (it’s not feasible for me to run it myself). I can’t really complain, the server I use just does not have a lot of memory. Thanks for the quick replies and explanations!
Looks great.
Can you give an example of how this enlarged “task bar” at the top right would interact with a very long “Summary:” line? i.e., on a smaller screen size a large summary line would intersect with the “task bar”. I imagine it will just float the whole subject line down underneath it?
@ErikSJ: Yeah, it pretty much just floats down to the next line. Later on, I’m going to adjust it to not do that if you have a certain amount of horizontal space. Since a lot of people run with a maximized browser, it should be more than enough.
I’ve played around with just having the whole Summary portion be down under the bar, but then there’s this big blank area in the top-left. I haven’t come up with a good solution for that just yet.